'Korea Nuclear Weapons And the six party talks\r'

'Just recently, sexual union Korean President fairy Jong Il proudly proclaimed the success of his authorities’s underground testing of their first-ever atomic artillery in the barren hinterlands of the his reclusive country. Western countries, lead by the united States, quickly condemned the move as an imminent threat to the security of the Korean peninsula and the military man(prenominal)ist semipolitical system in general, especi anyy in the light of the withdrawal of northward Korea from the six-party dialogue negotiating the law of closure of uniting Korea’s atomic facilities.On the former(a) hand, the nuclear testing was hai guide overwhelmingly by anti-imperialist states around the globe, led by Venezuela and Cuba, and anti-imperialist movements comprising mostly of Marxist parties of every sort, such(prenominal) as the Communist company of the Philippines and the Communist Party of India-Maoist. It was seen as a triumph of the Korean nation ove r against the intense political pressure by US imperialism to bring the north Korean government to its knees on all fronts †militarily and frugalally.Nonetheless, while the North Korean government was euphoric over its success, it earned the exasperation of the general creationwide partnership through the fall in Nations that sweeping scotch sanctions were imposed such as strict inspection of cargo shipments entering North Korean territory, notwithstanding the long-standing implied trade embargo by scores of countries around the world. Actually, the Korean peninsula has been the perennial piece of unending geopolitical tensions in the East Asian region since the Korean War in the fifties. This account will examine the nature of the six-party talks and North Korean brinksmanship in the context of North Korea’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.The Six-Party TalksThe Six-Party Talks include the republican People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, North Koreaâ€℠¢s official name), South Korea, join States, Russia, Japan, and the People’s Republic of China, whose essential goal has been the peaceful and verifiable denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. The talks were launched primarily due to the refusal of the fall in States to foster bilateral talks with the DPRK due to the latter(prenominal)’s breach of a 1994 Framework Agreement. muchover, it contained economic commitments by the ingredient states to the DPRK, in terms inciteing its vital force requirements for as long as the DPRK abandons its nuclear program, curiously its pursuit of nuclear weapons. On the other hand, the join States and its allies formally assured the DPRK that it shall not yield to acts of invasion against the reclusive country and seek preference ways in resolving the diplomatical issues with the DPRK. check to Dr. Edberto Villegas (personal communication, 2007), a political economist of the University of the Philippines specializing of collectivistic politics, the Six-Party talks was form not only to stabilize the threat of the DPRK against the united States and South Korea, fullly to secure the geopolitical concerns of the member states as well. Japanese participation in the talks is very important as the DPRK has time and again threatened Japan, due to historic tensions since the Japanese onset of the Korean peninsula a century ago and continues thus far up to the present, especially as Japan is right away seen as a reliable ally of the United States in enforcing its foreign policies in the region. China is as well as interested in the talks as it is deep down its national interest that the Korean peninsula is stable to resist the undocumented and illegal migration of North Koreans to Chinese territories. (globalsecurity.org, 2007)North Korean BrinksmanshipIn foreign politics, the DPRK and its leader, Kim Jong Il, has been adjudged the master of nuclear brinksmanship in securing economic and military concessions from world powers, including the United States. As the DPRK knows in full well its geopolitical handicap, it continually breaches international agreements in supposed pursuit and assertion of its national interest and sovereignty, especially when it deliberately withdrew from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation accordance and insisted on producing nuclear weapons for its defense against perceptions of a combination by the United States forcibly overthrow the Kim Jong Il regime by force.According Villegas (personal communication, 2007), the DPRK fully debates that only by make up its military capability, particularly nuclear power, can the DPRK secure substantial concessions from world powers, arranged with the Maoist maxim of political power appear from the barrel of a gun. These concessions, however, ar not unaccompanied of a military or diplomatic character, exclusively usually in terms of economic aid, as the DPRK continues to battle years of infertile agricultur al lands and shortage that has led to the deaths and exodus of thousands of North Koreans.As can be seen from the recent nuclear testing in the hinterlands of North Korea, the world, while united in its condemnation of the act, has acceded, to a certain extent, to the demands of the North Korean government such as the release of its $25 million crisp assets in Macau and the delivery of more economic aid from developed nations. Nonetheless, it can be surmised that the actuations of the DPRK and the flaunting of its military cogency are not exactly aimed at with child(p) the world, especially South Korea, Japan and the United States, but only to secure adequate leverage for political and economic agreements which would not have been possible if the DPRK acted otherwise. More so, the DPRK are not that ignorant of the military recital of the world to foolishly start military aggressions against sensed enemy states, knowing fully well the quality military power of the United State s and its allies. (personal communication, 2007)However, in order to fully understand the North Korean nuclear question, the DPRK strategy of Songun politics must be examined. According to Han of the Unification Institute in New York, the DPRK views the kind of the DPRK and the United States not as co-equal states in international law but as opposing and loath(p) entities representing the conflict between imperialism and socialism, in which peaceful coexistence is neer possible. fag Jong Il believes that all of these are part of the efforts of the DPRK to foist an ideological confrontation against the United States and secure the socialist gains in the Korean peninsula (Han, 2003) More so, the Songun politics of the DPRK involves the building of a strong revolutionary army to keep on the North Korean socialist system from collapse, over and above the necessity of putting adequate provender on the tables of the Korean people. Such an utterly warmonger mindset is a big departure from the undefiled Marxist theory of empowering the working class and the wither away of the state, leading foreign policy experts to believe that King Jong Il’s brinksmanship is merely to contain the survival of his family’s hold on the entire North Korean political system. (globalsecurity.org) Nonetheless, the military number of policies like these has been very effective in forcing the international community to stand at attention and bear in mind to the demands, even force, of the DPRK.Conclusion: The World and the Way ForwardThe Korean nuclear question has given the United States and the international community a terrible political headache which all must continually confront until the threat of the DPRK has been conclusively neutralized.  While it is true that independent nations such as the DPRK must assert its national sovereignty at all times against external threats, particularly imperialist countries, the manner by which the reclusive regime of Kin g Jong Il has been conducting the defense of its homeland and revolution borders on a subjective revolutionary hysteria which the rulers of the DPRK are exploiting to the prejudice of the welfare of its people.There are many other ways to confront modern imperialism which are no less revolutionary, such as the strides achieved by the Venezuelan and Cuban governments in their experiment with socialism without adversely affecting the lives of their people. As such, it is clearly the responsibility of the international community to diplomatically convince the DPRK to gradually hook up with the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and cease using military blackmail as a ruse to secure concessions from world powers. An outright denuclearization policy as suggested by the United States and Japan might be totally phantasmagoric at present, and might even provoke the DPRK further. The roadway to a lasting peace in the Korean peninsula is an arduous one which can only be confronted if the world itself is prepared to build confidence with the DPRK that aggression against the communist country is none of the options considered to resolve the long-standing diplomatic dispute on nuclear weapons.Works Cited:Han, Ho-sok. Songun political relation of North Korea & the Situation on the Korean             Peninsula. Songun Politics Study Group. Sept. 8, 2003. Retrieved from             http://www.geocities.com/songunpoliticsstudygroup/Songuninterview.htm        l on April 17, 2007. Six-Party Talks. GlobalSecurity.Org. Retrieved from             http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/dprk/6-party.htm on April 16, 2007. Villegas, Edberto. Email Interview. April 14, 2007.\r\n'