Current Trends in the War on Terror Essay

As the field is cowering in terror from the 9/11 approachings and the shelling incidents in Indonesia and other parts of the world, the worlds attention is shifted now to where the dishonors whitethorn occur next and what can be done to address the situation. Some insinuate that the answer lies in being adequate to suppress and perhaps eliminate all(prenominal) of the terrorist cells all over the world. The hassle in that respect, however, is that any(prenominal) attack that is home runed at eliminating terrorist cells would necessarily cover up each host country where they may be located and in each Middle Eastern country, such an attack could prove disastrous (Campbell & Flourney 372).The much than practical and i underwrite firmness to this problem therefore lies at a to a greater extent fundamental level a more than basic level wherein the country has more matchs and no international liability (Kochler 37). The solution to this problem is by improving fra me in security in ready to retain the occurrence of these terrorist attacks while the international companionship attempts for answers to address this problem at a global scale. At this point in time, domestic policies would be the best pickax in fighting the cont block against terror.This perfectly dis pattern will therefore seek to shed light on the anaesthetize of terrorism and the all important(p) role that the call up security plays in such. To gain a better understanding of the problem, it is important to basic analyze the current trends that have been taken relative to frame in security to look the refuge of the public from terrorist attacks. This will therefore be supplemented by an explanation on how border security can take an plain larger role. The most crucial aspect in relation to border security and its role in the war against terror look ups the aviation industry.Since the 9/11 attacks, the public confidence with heed to airwave travel has greatly been shaken (Taylor 2). The attacks had the solvent of sending a message that now, even air two-dimensionals could be used as missiles to target buildings pictureless of whether there were people on jump on the aircraft of non. Every plane disassemble that is reported on the news is surmise to have been caused by a terrorist attack rather than retributive an fitment malfunction or a pilot error. In solvent to these attacks, security has been considerably increased in airports all over the world.Every passenger is now subject to a all-embracing body search and every tidy sum carried and checked in item is exhaustively inspected for any suspicious objects that can either cause an explosion or sanction a hijacker in gaining control over the aircraft (Campbell & Flourney 52). The impact has not been limited to airport security as even airplane manufacturers and airlines have resorted to induction devices and taking precautions with regard to what to do in case an airp lane is hijacked.One of the safety measures that have been suggested and is highly debated is the issuing of fortify for the pilots so that they may be open to map themselves against any terrorist hijackers that are equal to(p) to force themselves into the cockpits (Lott 1). The current controversy with regard to airline security concerns the proposal to equip the pilots of airplanes with weapons in order to cling to themselves from any hijackers that manage to assent the cockpit (Taylor 2).This proposal is of course faced with a lot of opposition because of the implications of allowing pilots to be arm in aircrafts. in that location is a lot of concern with regard to the security of the other passengers on board just in case the armed pilots do decide to turn on the other co-pilots and hijack the aircraft themselves or give way passengers as hostages for whatever purpose. The proponents for arming the pilots make do that it is the best option because the pilots need to de fend themselves against the terrorist hijackers (Keeler 151).The problem with this is that it negates the training of the pilots which is that in times such as hijackings they are not supposed to deal with the terrorists further sort of secure the cockpit and land the plane as soon as possible (Will 1). The concern here is that the plane should be set down right away in order to protect not only the passengers hardly also the people on the grease who may become targets or victims as the 9/11 experience has shown.The transaction of the pilot is not concern himself with whatever goes on in the cabin but preferably make sure that the plane is safely on the ground where there are more units who can deal with the situation properly. Pilots are not adequately trained to deal with hijacking situations in terms of dealing directly with the terrorist hijackers (Will 1). another(prenominal) argument for the arming of the pilots is that such a measure is only designed to protect the pi lots from terrorist hijackers who succeed in gaining entry into the cockpit (3). patch there as some moral excellence to this precautionary measure, there is no attempt that the armed pilots will do just that. There are instances when certain people, pilots included, enter a cowboys or renegade expressive style (Will 1). Most of the pilots have received a degree of military training as fighter pilots and there is some rightfulness to the profiling of fighter pilots live wires and risk-takers (Will 1). The end result in these situations could be that instead of protecting the cockpit and landing the plane exchangeable they are supposed to, a depend of these former fighter pilots could engage the terrorist hijackers.