Man Is Not Truly One, but Truly Two’. Discuss This Observation on Human Nature

For some centuries now mevery batch as well as philosophers ease up wondered what portions make up pederastic benevolente disposition and the pitying mind along with its thinking. Man is truly a complex individual, as every homo has their own reasons for nourishment, and the m whatever reasons they have for doing what it is that they do. Has hu piece of music bes we posses reliable sectionistics, and it is strategic to expose these sectionistics in the password of human nature. As we ar made up of thoughts and ideas, as it is our thoughts and ideas that causes us to act out on what it is we truly want to do.This essay bequeath comp ar contrast two distinguishable forms of writing in spite of appearance the corresponding era. The Curious Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and The Importance of Being Earnest it is interesting to go across these two distinguishable forms of writing manage to capture antithetical cycles of human nature, and still manage to somewhat correlate. Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, portray a robust aesthesis of loss or confusion of identity in the very pop novel, written by Robert-Louise St horizontalson. For its time, the topic of human nature was something that various authors offered their opinions on.The equals of Charles daimon through his novel Great Expectations deals with a numerous amount of records and their trip through life, and their constant battle with their own identity and nature. The novel deals with a great adept of Darwinism at that place is no mistake in verbalise that Stevenson was influenced my Darwins contr everyw hithersial theory on evolution, and how man came into being. Nor is on that point any substantial change when, in Stevensons Jekyll and Hyde, the iniquity follows from the good. The two atomic number 18 the kindred. Jekyll is, to begin with, a good man. It wasthe exacting nature of my aspirations kind of than any discloseicular degradation in my faults, that made me what I was. Yet when I looked upon that ugly idol in the glass, I was sentience of right and wrong of no repugnance, rather of a leap of welcome. This, also, was myself. It seemed natural and human. In my eyes it bore a livelier image of the spirit, it seemed more express and single, than the imperfect and divided countenance I had been hitherto accustomed to call mine. From Masseys critical analysis it is undefended to see what argument he brings forth.The first thing that springs out well-nigh be how he describes evil and good being one in the equal, the fact that one comes before the opposite, the other deriving from the first. The feel of a man at first being good and thus turning evil, essential wherefore mean that within good, deplorable is lay dormant. This argument buttocks easily fit into the discussion of human nature. A shed light onic example mass be found in the parole story of Kane and Able in Genesis chapter 4 through to 16. two characters be depicted as th e yearic good vs. vil although both(prenominal) habitualwealth where arduous to please God, one decides to take his brothers life out of jealousy. The consequential thing to none here is that, they both had the akin intention, pleasing God. Furthermore, the citation included in Masseys interpretation is also interesting and important for the discussion of human nature. Dr Jekyll himself talks rough his own pleasures in the tree trunk of Mr Hyde. He describes him as an idol something or someone that he looks up to. He also says in his tattle that, it seemed natural and human and that he felt welcomed by the presence of Hyde.I moot that through these landed estatements Stevenson was exploring the different consciousness of man and how man longs for superpower and the longing to do something different and short outrageous. The social class of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is also something that one must take into retainer when reading this novel. The simple fact that both th ese characters ar not in the dishonor class of their Victorian society is very important. Mr Hyde commits various different crimes, that wouldnt normally be associated with a man of his social standards.This facet allows the novel to be considered as something out of the norm for the society in which he wrote in. An article on the Internet by Joel Joyce, talks about(predicate) the contestant battle between good and evil. These are two aspects about human nature that are always at loggerheads in, literature, films, and theatre. in that location is a genius of both characteristics in human beings. When we look at criminals and lawful citizens, we often wonder what separates the two. Most tribe would agree that at to the lowest degree some nation are bad chronic criminals residing in capital of Mississippi State Prison, ruthless Colombian drug lords, and inner city coterie giveers. further what about the productive members of society, law abiding citizens, family pile w ho respect the rights of others and the part of the law? Where do they fall on the spectrum between good and bad? If we asked this question in a random poll, people would give a range of answers. Some would say that man is rudimentaryally good, except for a few deranged people like those mentioned others would say that man is largely good, simply there is also a little bit of evil in all of us still others would assert that man is objectivefamily and social influences determine his inclination toward goodness or evil.A few people might even believe that mans natural appetency is toward evil. In this article I couldnt help but bank bill some certain confusableities between some of the points and some of the issues raised in Stevensons Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, the fact that everyman is capable of doing evil, and that being good and evil are in fact choices that one can make in his/her lifetime. Mr Hyde did not come from just anywhere he was more than an spay ego. He was the e vil that apparently lives in everyman. The notion that everyman is pointing towards evil is quiet seeable in Mr Hydes statement of the case in the tenth chapter. There was something strange in my sensations, something indescribably red-hot and, from its very novelty, incredibly sweet. I felt younger, lighter, happier in body within I was conscious of a heady recklessness, a current of inconvenience oneselfed sensual images running like a millrace in my fancy, a solution of the bonds of obligation, an unknown but not an innocent freedom of the brain.I knew myself, at the first breath of this new life, to be more wicked, tenfold more wicked, sold a break ones back to my cowcatcher evil and the thought, in that moment, braced and delighted me like wine. From this statement made by Dr Jekyll himself, not Hyde, it illustrates to us that, man is definitely not one and is two the fact that Jekyll embraces this new body and relishes at its prospects must consequently mean that there is an element of evil lurking within everyman, even someone as responsible and respectable as Mr Hyde felt for this sexual love trap, if you call it. He also describes this ordeal as freedom of the soul. What this can reveal to us about man is that, we long to be free of the restrictions of the society hat we live in. he states that he felt younger, lighter and happier in this body. Notably Dr Jekyll boldly says to my original evil which today portrays to us that this is his roots and his original state as a human being, so then the question comes to mind that is in fact Dr Jekyll an interpolate ego of Mr Hyde or the other way round?So within this statement there is an element of escapism, which is normally found amongst people who suffer from (MPD) multiple soulality disorder. According to an article on wisegeek. om these are some qualities of someone who suffers from multiple psycheality disorder. Multiple individualisedity disorder is almost always caused by persistent com bat injury, or past trauma such as early childhood sexual or physiologic abuse. When trauma occurs over a long period of time, the affected person whitethorn begin to cope by completely disassociating from the events that cause the trauma. This can lead to alters, separate personalities within the selfsame(prenominal) person who either are aware of, or are unaware of the abuse. Alters can be childlike, strong, male, or female, and often emerge as a coping device. There are a couple of important factors to take notes on in this article. Firstly, the article states that, the same person who either are aware of, or are unaware this is something that can be linked back to Mr Hyde and Jekyll, they are both aware of each others personality co-existing within the same body. The most interesting thing about Dr Jekyll is that he is still conscience within the conscienceless of Hyde. He has the will power to take over if he really wanted. and he played it out in such a way that he was the weaker of the two. This is the second point, .This can lead to alters, separate personalities within the same person aware of, or are unaware of the abuse Massey goes into more detail about this very same point, and which is also pointing towards the direction of the multiple personality disorder, although his argument does somewhat go against this interpretation of (MPD). Inevitably, this argument will seem to have some relation to the insistence of the existentialists that man is finally alone, and that all his apparent duality, which provides him with an imaginary interlocutor from the eginning, is only a protective delusion to help him cope with his basic loneliness. The difference is, first, that in my conception man is not lonely, but one(a) he is afraid, not of having no one to communicate with him and thus to run his existence, but of having no choice of selves. What this offers and suggests about human nature is that there seems to be a strong sense of duality involved in all man. The fact that he states that man does not want to be alone there is a need of companionship within ones-self, which may explain the reason why Jekyll did not have the strength to over power Hyde.The final statement is a very strong one. But of having no choice of selves this is Masseys final argument, which in a sense points to the direction of Darwinism. The fact that Man is the final state of human being, who purportedly evolved from apes. There seems to be a longing for something more. Furthermore, the sheer fact that Hyde is set forth as being ape like and like a pixie jumped does illustrate that Stevenson had reversed the line of evolution. In contrast to this, The Importance Of being Earnest by Oscar Wilde deals with some quiet different human characteristics.There is no coincidence between the protagonists take and the take holds title. One must first identify the meaning behind the actual adduce. Earnest According to Dictionary. com, here are the different meanings and interpretations of what Earnest means. Adjective 1. Serious in intention, purpose, or apparent motion ingenuously zealous an earnest track downer. 2. Showing depth and sincerity of liveliness earnest words an earnest entreaty. 3. Seriously important demanding or receiving life-threatening solicitude. Noun 4. Full seriousness, as of intention or purpose to speak in earnest.The characters name works as a pun, which automatically gives us a hint that there are two different characters at work here. When we are first introduced to the character the audience is expecting a character that is sincere and consecutive to our own belief of what earnestness truly is. According to a chapter on Earnestness, by Walter E. Houghton, Now, patently, Old Leisure was not in earnest. He was not, as one would say, taking life seriously. And that means, we see, that intellectually he has no concern whatever with ideas.He goes to church either to fall asleep or to repeat the great doctr ines of the creed without a moments attention or an ounce of sincere convictionhe is quiet unmindful to any larger scheme of human destiny, whether natural or supernatural, and to what duties or responsibilities it might entail. His conscience, therefore, is quiet easy and his daily life is devoted to the usage of sensual pleasure. Through this statement we gain more of an insight into the character of Ernest, Jack. He is the complete opposite of what the audience thinks he should be.In Act 1 scene eight, Jack (Ernest) is accused of having something, which does not belong to him. Through the parley it is revealed to us that, Ernest has been living a treble life. Well, my name is Ernest in townsfolk and Jack in the country, and the cigarette case was given to me in the country. This is intelligibly included for a reason firstly it shapes the play into what it truly is. But also there is also an element of duality involved in this, just like Stevensons The curious Case of Dr Je kyll and Mr Hyde the element of living a double life and ultimately becoming different people.Unlike Dr Jekyll he has had and made a choice to live this double life, by creating an alter ego for himself named Jack. It is important to identify what an alter ego is, and what the writer is trying to achieve by giving Ernest an alter ego. Having an alter ego at times can be beneficial, provided it does not go overboard. It gives the person a sense of completeness. However, if the alter ego is more perfect than your real self, then it can result in low self-esteem. It is also at times seen that if the alter ego is dominating, then it can prevent a person from leading a normal life.If you have an alter ego then it is important that you put ont let it dominate over your personal life. This can affect your friends and family in a negative manner. As we can see from this detailed analysis on what an alter ego is, we can understand in more detail why Ernests character would want to create a n alter ego for himself in the two different towns. It could be argued that Jack feels a certain connection and belonging to the liquidation as it allows him to do exactly what he wants.This can also be seen a s a criticism of the Victorian society suggesting that people are not allowed to be themselves in certain environment and places. Furthermore, there is still an element of duality within Jacks real name Ernest. Through Algernons statement. You answer to the name of Ernest. You look as if your name was Ernest. You are the most earnest person I ever precept in my life. Through the use of wit Wilde delivers a funny juxtaposition, Algernon is accuse Jack of being a liar and a fraud, but that calls him an earnest person, which is the direct opposite of what he should be saying.Instead a moralistic paradox is created. Earnestness, which refers to the quality of being serious and the quality of being sincere, is impel around in the play, and characters like Jack, who the word is normally associated with is seen as a hypocrite as he is just the opposite of what the word is. This is part of Wildes plan of comment on the Victorian society and the nature of the men who lived in that society. More than half of modern culture depends on what shouldnt read This statement made by the character Algernon subtly mocks the Victorian society as their rules where strict on what should and shouldnt be done.Which then calls into question the whole idea of earnestness in men. These characters presented to us are men and woman who are of a certain class, higher(prenominal) class, and they are supposed to be men and woman of high regards, but the majority of the time they are seen as hypocrites and untrue. This could be an attempt to destabilize men and call into question human nature as whole. In addition, the class system is also called into question, through Algernons statement. Really, if the scorn orders dont set us a good example, what on primer coat is the use of them?They seem, as a class, to have absolutely no sense of moral responsibility. There are two things here about human nature that is worth discussing. The first half of the citation is on leadership. Oscar Wilde, here talks of how humans have a sense of neediness and a certain longing to be lead, but something interesting happens here, rather than the higher class leading the glare class it is the other way round, a sense of hierarchy has been switched round to the opposite side of the spectrum. The second half of this quote is also equally important.This is a typical statement for someone of a higher class to make about the lower classed. They seem, as a class, to have absolutely no sense of moral responsibility. Wilde is clever here I believe that he knew that his statement prior to this about the lower class being an example for the higher classed individuals. This statement was quiet common for a higher classed member of society to make towards a lower classed member. A vi vid example of Victorian human nature at work in its society. Homosexuality is a great factor in Oscar Wildes work.The fact that he tried to cover up the homosexual tendencies that Jack and Algernon both possessed, and instead turned them into brothers at the end. Their constant dither was more than what it seemed it became flirting. It is no mistaking that Wilde himself was an homosexual, and according to some other writers he too struggled with acceptance within his society, which led him to lead a double life. Wildes need for social acceptance may have been a factor in his 1884 marriage to a young, somewhat conventional and naive socialite, Constance Lloyd, a union that quickly produced two sons. It is then no secret that Wilde in creating these characters was a microcosm of his own life, Jack lived a double life, Which illustrates to me that he too struggled with acceptance in the village and city where he bears two different names. Finally, Stevensons and Wildes work both offe r different issues that man goes through. In The Importance of Being Earnest the themes of homosexuality and truthfulness dealt with, is something that was pertinent to his society and is still relevant today. Homosexuals still struggle with acceptance be it through family, friends or society.Furthermore, not only homosexuals feel this, and I believe that this is something that Wilde wanted to portray through his work. Acceptance is a part of clement Nature that all men go through, just as a child wants to be accepted by friends he/she wants to also be accepted by his/her family, it is a liveliness that human beings go through. This is the same feeling that Kane felt in Genesis towards God that led him to start his brother, as he struggled with acceptance, he felt like an outcast, which is a feeling that no man wants to feel. Thus releasing his dormant evil nature, separating himself from the good.This is the same notion that William Golding went through in The Lord of Flies thi s is the idea that when man is separated from good, he has no alternative but to turn its original state of evilness. One such writer is William Golding, and one such harbour is The Lord of The Flies. As the appended essay in the popular Capricorn magnetic variation reveals, the theme (according to the author) is an attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature. hither Golding and Ardrey speak with a single voice mans nature is the central determining factor of what man does.Ardrey watches animals in the wild because only in a state of nature can we be sure that we are observing true animal behaviour. Golding places his innocent schoolboys on an uninhabited, inescapable island. Ardrey re-constructs prehistory, when a subhuman wildcat made its way toward becoming man. Golding, who has also written a book about prehistory (The Inheritors, Harcourt, 1962), traces reversion of his British youth to a kind of subhuman existence. Likewise Stevenson goes through another cycle and almost similar stage of Human nature.His work The curios Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde has been something that also survives time as it still has relevance today. The idea has found its way onto cinema screens in films such as the Incredible Hulk the transformation of Jekyll is presented to us as a one way journey as my Hydes character is much stronger than Jekylls and he is constantly seeing himself through Hydes eyes. Eventually the power of Hyde becomes too much for him and there is no other possibility but to destroy his body, inevitably killing off both consciousnesses.Both stories (The importance of Being Earnest and The Curios Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde) do however have one major factor in common, they both understand the power of class and social hierarchy. All their main characters are middle classed or higher because they wanted to appeal to the greater half of their society. The reason being, the lower classed where the outcasts of their socie ty, so if these themes had been about the lower classed people in the higher class will not pay much attention to the lower classed.