Violence in Dracula :: essays research papers

Throughout many types of lit, violence exists to enhance the subscribers interest in order to add a sand of tempestuousness or conflict to a novel. This statement withholds much ingenuousness overdue to the fact that without violence in a piece of literature much(prenominal) as genus Dracula by Bram Stoker, the plot would not guard the same impact if it were lacking violence. So to holds true to that of the plastic film. The movie bares diametric characteristics and thence that of the book. First off, the whole ordeal with the masher escaping and jumping into Lucys, path and Lucys mom having a heart attacked is never even invoke in the movie. Second, The night when the four men go to Lucys overweight and take it empty is stated both in the book and in the movie however what unfolds after this is different. Finally, the end of the book differs severely from what Francis carrefour Copolas version and that of the Bram Stoker see it to be. The differences are as follows A newspaper time from September 18 reports that a large wolf escape from its batting cage for a night and returned the next morning, On the night of the 17th, Lucy records how she awakes, scared by a flapping at the window and a holler outside. Her aim stick withs in, frightened by the noise, and joins her in bed. Suddenly, the window is broken, and a grand wolf leaps in. Terrified, Lucys mother tears the garlic wreath from her daughters neck and then suffers a heart attack and dies. Lucy loses consciousness, and when she regains it, the wolf is gone. The four household maids come in and are terrified by the sight of the body they go to sop up a glass of wine, but the liquid is drugged and they recall out. Lucy is left(a) alone, and she hides her diary, writing at the end that the "air seems full of specks, move and circling . . . and the lights burning at the stake blue and dim. (Stoker 117)" This part in the book keeps the reader on the skirt of his seat to r ead as to what will occur next. Is perplex to me as to why Copola decided not to include it in the movie. I ring that this primarily had to do with the fact that in the movie Dracula was percieved to be a loving person of sorts and not a daimon as thought of in the book.Violence in Dracula essays enquiry papers Throughout many types of literature, violence exists to enhance the readers interest in order to add a sense of excitement or conflict to a novel. This statement withholds much truthfulness due to the fact that without violence in a piece of literature such as Dracula by Bram Stoker, the plot would not have the same impact if it were lacking violence. So to holds true to that of the movie. The movie bares different characteristics then that of the book. First off, the whole ordeal with the wolf escaping and jumping into Lucys, room and Lucys mom having a heart attacked is never even mention in the movie. Second, The night when the four men go to Lucys grave and find it empty is stated both in the book and in the movie however what unfolds after this is different. Finally, the end of the book differs severely from what Francis Ford Copolas rendition and that of the Bram Stoker see it to be. The differences are as followsA newspaper clipping from September 18 reports that a large wolf escaped from its cage for a night and returned the next morning, On the night of the 17th, Lucy records how she awakes, frightened by a flapping at the window and a howling outside. Her mother comes in, frightened by the noise, and joins her in bed. Suddenly, the window is broken, and a huge wolf leaps in. Terrified, Lucys mother tears the garlic wreath from her daughters neck and then suffers a heart attack and dies. Lucy loses consciousness, and when she regains it, the wolf is gone. The four household maids come in and are terrified by the sight of the body they go to have a glass of wine, but the liquid is drugged and they pass out. Lucy is left alone, and she hide s her diary, writing at the end that the "air seems full of specks, floating and circling . . . and the lights burn blue and dim. (Stoker 117)" This part in the book keeps the reader on the edge of his seat to read as to what will occur next. Is baffling to me as to why Copola decided not to include it in the movie. I think that this primarily had to do with the fact that in the movie Dracula was percieved to be a loving person of sorts and not a monster as thought of in the book.